<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real Beauty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lindsaydayton.com/2006/10/17/real-beauty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lindsaydayton.com/2006/10/17/real-beauty/</link>
	<description>Romance, adventure, and very little sunshine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:56:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: megan</title>
		<link>http://lindsaydayton.com/2006/10/17/real-beauty/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[megan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindsaydayton.com/2006/10/17/real-beauty/#comment-97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops, I made a typo! 
Once you submit the comment, it&#039;s final, huh?
Wow, that&#039;s commitment. 
Now I&#039;m commenting on my comment on my comment on  lindsay&#039;s blog. This is getting weird!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, I made a typo!<br />
Once you submit the comment, it&#8217;s final, huh?<br />
Wow, that&#8217;s commitment.<br />
Now I&#8217;m commenting on my comment on my comment on  lindsay&#8217;s blog. This is getting weird!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megan</title>
		<link>http://lindsaydayton.com/2006/10/17/real-beauty/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[megan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindsaydayton.com/2006/10/17/real-beauty/#comment-96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Soy &quot;milk&quot; is neither milk nor juice. Discuss.

May I quote Wikipedia? Here goes: &quot;Traditional soymilk, a stable emulsion of oil, water and protein, is simply an aqueous extract of whole soybeans. The liquid is produced by soaking dry soybeans, and grinding them with water. Soymilk contains about the same proportion of protein as cow&#039;s milk~ around 3.5%; also 2% fat, 2.9% carbohydrate and 0.5% ash. Soymilk can be made at home with traditional kitchen tools or with a soymilk machine.&quot;

After reading that, &quot;soyade&quot; seems oddly fitting, but no good. 
&quot;Soy emulsion&quot;?
&quot;Soy extract?&quot; 
I still like soy nectar, hence the removal of the quotation marks. 
Can&#039;t you just hear the commercial?
&quot;Soy Nectar, drink of the Gods&quot; 
Mmm, tasty!

And it&#039;s a stable emulsion to boot. I figure that means that the mixture stays together and doesn&#039;t separate into powdery water. But, I like to think that means it has a self-functioning system of mental and physical rejuvenation, therapists and prozac not necessary. Would we become more stable by drinking it? I like to think so!

So, soy nectar. Tell your friends.

Does anyone read this? Well, it made me chuckle at least! (If this comment made at least one person better, that it was worth it! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soy &#8220;milk&#8221; is neither milk nor juice. Discuss.</p>
<p>May I quote Wikipedia? Here goes: &#8220;Traditional soymilk, a stable emulsion of oil, water and protein, is simply an aqueous extract of whole soybeans. The liquid is produced by soaking dry soybeans, and grinding them with water. Soymilk contains about the same proportion of protein as cow&#8217;s milk~ around 3.5%; also 2% fat, 2.9% carbohydrate and 0.5% ash. Soymilk can be made at home with traditional kitchen tools or with a soymilk machine.&#8221;</p>
<p>After reading that, &#8220;soyade&#8221; seems oddly fitting, but no good.<br />
&#8220;Soy emulsion&#8221;?<br />
&#8220;Soy extract?&#8221;<br />
I still like soy nectar, hence the removal of the quotation marks.<br />
Can&#8217;t you just hear the commercial?<br />
&#8220;Soy Nectar, drink of the Gods&#8221;<br />
Mmm, tasty!</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s a stable emulsion to boot. I figure that means that the mixture stays together and doesn&#8217;t separate into powdery water. But, I like to think that means it has a self-functioning system of mental and physical rejuvenation, therapists and prozac not necessary. Would we become more stable by drinking it? I like to think so!</p>
<p>So, soy nectar. Tell your friends.</p>
<p>Does anyone read this? Well, it made me chuckle at least! (If this comment made at least one person better, that it was worth it! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://lindsaydayton.com/2006/10/17/real-beauty/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Megan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 02:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindsaydayton.com/2006/10/17/real-beauty/#comment-95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, I was brewing something enlightened to say
when I read Bronwyn&#039;s wisdom about milking a 
soy. Now I&#039;m distracted and must figure out 
which is the appropriate name... Juice doesn&#039;t 
seem right either since you don&#039;t squeeze the
juice out of a soy bean...or do you? I&#039;ll do 
some research and get back to you.
OK, on makeup. Don&#039;t take any poop from anyone
about makeup. Wear it, don&#039;t wear it, it
doesn&#039;t matter. The point is you don&#039;t HAVE to
wear it to be beautiful. Can you? Why not?
It&#039;s fun. It&#039;s expression. If you absolutely 
can NOT wear it, that can be just as 
oppressive as feeling you need to wear it. 

There are many ways to &quot;take care of yourself&quot; 
but there are no sure-fire indicators that 
you love and respect yourself. It&#039;s all about 
the intention behind the act, no? So, seeing 
someone dressed up is not proof to me that they
take care of themselves. They could just be 
covering up some hidden shame or guilt. 

&quot;Soy drink&quot; is aweful. &quot;Soy-ade&quot; denotes 
artificial, no? How about &quot;Soy Nectar&quot;? That 
seems to capture the respect it deserves! Is it
scientificly correct? I dunno!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I was brewing something enlightened to say<br />
when I read Bronwyn&#8217;s wisdom about milking a<br />
soy. Now I&#8217;m distracted and must figure out<br />
which is the appropriate name&#8230; Juice doesn&#8217;t<br />
seem right either since you don&#8217;t squeeze the<br />
juice out of a soy bean&#8230;or do you? I&#8217;ll do<br />
some research and get back to you.<br />
OK, on makeup. Don&#8217;t take any poop from anyone<br />
about makeup. Wear it, don&#8217;t wear it, it<br />
doesn&#8217;t matter. The point is you don&#8217;t HAVE to<br />
wear it to be beautiful. Can you? Why not?<br />
It&#8217;s fun. It&#8217;s expression. If you absolutely<br />
can NOT wear it, that can be just as<br />
oppressive as feeling you need to wear it. </p>
<p>There are many ways to &#8220;take care of yourself&#8221;<br />
but there are no sure-fire indicators that<br />
you love and respect yourself. It&#8217;s all about<br />
the intention behind the act, no? So, seeing<br />
someone dressed up is not proof to me that they<br />
take care of themselves. They could just be<br />
covering up some hidden shame or guilt. </p>
<p>&#8220;Soy drink&#8221; is aweful. &#8220;Soy-ade&#8221; denotes<br />
artificial, no? How about &#8220;Soy Nectar&#8221;? That<br />
seems to capture the respect it deserves! Is it<br />
scientificly correct? I dunno!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

