To: The guy sitting next to me at Zoka last night
Thank you for letting me take the empty seat at your table. Space was especially tight, and my computer’s battery isn’t what it used to be. Thanks also for letting me chime in with my Trivial Pursuit answers. It is admirable to see people playing a version that is older than they are–kudos to you for that.
Now that I’ve had some time to think about it, I would like to respond to your comment, “I really believe MySpace is of the Devil.”
No one–I mean NO ONE–who has seen MySpace doesn’t think it can be used for evil. Not only has it enabled dangerous lifestyles and child predators, but it has revived ascii art and created an entirely new evil: Blingees.
The point I want to make is that “used for evil” is very different than “of the devil.” Cars are often used for evil. Medicines are often used for evil. Frankly, churches are sometimes used for evil. No one believes that this makes these things exclusively the devil’s territory, it just happens that people are generally susceptible to making bad decisions.
There are three effects of your comment and the underlying belief that you may not have considered. First, you disregard, discount and dismiss all the ways that MySpace is used for good: Relationships get healed, faith-based events get publicized, lonely people connect with other lonely people. There is a lot of wholesome, Godly stuff going on out there, and by assigning it to the devil, you rob it of its glory.
Second, you give credit where it is not deserved. In the case that the Devil exists as a sentient being, how do you suppose that verbally giving him attribution would affect his power?
Third, you reinforce stereotypes that Christians are narrow-minded, naive, judgmental, self-righteous, isolationist fear-mongers. Please, please think next time you decide to make such flip statements about good and evil. Next time, the person who overhears you will probably take it out on their opinions of you and your god, rather than on their blog.
